I have this friend I'll call Jane. Her name isn't really Jane, but she tells me not to quote her and since this is all about her, a fictitious name is in order. I don't blame her, of course, because I know what she meant by that.
In years past, she was the one who listened to me drone on about whatever life was dishing me at the time. At a critical juncture, she would calmly turn to me and say something profound meant to set me straight and put my life in perspective. Saying something like, "Why are you worrying about something that hasn't happened and that you have no reason to believe ever will happen?" Duh! (or do we say, Ah-Ha, now?).
For as much as she made those quiet comments that were not only introspective on her part as much as reflective of me, she balked at the idea of being quoted. A dread-filled grunt coming up from her throat, she would ask apprehensively what she had said that was so memorable. Then I would relate the entire conversation, how I felt, what was bothering until I got to the point where she stunned me with blinding logic. Oh, okay, she would answer grudgingly.
To understand the symbiosis of our friendship, two characteristics stand out. I remember blocks of conversation as well as I remember my address; Jane has locked inside her mind a vault of observations, interpretations, and no-nonsense philosophies about people that she mainly keeps to herself. When she steps out of her quiet, contemplative state to make one of her existential comments, I am there to embrace her clarity and store it in my long-term memory until needed again for my next dramatic scene.
Likewise, our writing styles are vastly different. Hers is surreal and dark exposing the irony of society, as in her long-forgotten "Dead Pet Store," to my dark attempt at optimistic realism struggling to find truth, such as in my story, "The Protector." Back in the day, when we wore tight mini-skirts and high heels to elegant affairs, where I watched with amusement as men stumbled over themselves watching from across the room as her long legs passed by, and while we stood laughing between ourselves about all of those who didn't "get" our inside jokes (oh-la-la!), neither of us wrote too much. No wonder. There was a period when I did write. Jane read some of my short stories that I now think are ridiculously self-absorbed, but she never came out and said that. That was kind.
During revisions of some of my old short stories, I cringed at parts that were opinionated, childish or just not well put. I relived the political climate of that time in those stories, sometimes radical, sometimes naïve. Rolling my eyes as I furiously wrote over those bad bits, Jane pops into my head to remind me of why she does not like to be quoted. Jane said the comments were not as important as her feelings about being quoted. When I asked her why, she said that she did not like to be quoted because she might change her mind about the subject later and would not want to be accountable for the previous statement.
I had to think about that for awhile, but not long. Just the other day, I had a conversation with another writer about the daring of putting ourselves out there in blogs, where once it's out there, the words remain even when you pull them down from your website. Someone somewhere will have copied it, reprinted it or otherwise saved it, just as we all do. Then, there is another writer I know who told me long ago that anything that is written is never lost and can always resurface. It all makes Jane's statements all the more chilling. I only hope that in twenty years, I don't find this piece as bad as what I wrote twenty years ago. I certainly hope no one quotes me on that.
